Saturday, October 23, 2010

What’s up doc?: The ’squabble’ over ’squalene’

A single injection of squalene may not sound like much, unless you look at the pathological, medical evidence

Why is it that many health professionals working in a local hospital refuse to get the new H1N1 flu vaccination?

watch?v=zhQ-Tu4ljEo

The uninjectable suddenly has become injectable The uninjectable suddenly has become injectable

The reason – the inclusion of squalene.

Squalene may be safe in certain environments but rumor has it that it should never, repeat never be “injected”.

Well, if it’s in a flu vaccination, how are we supposed to believe it enters our system – correct – it’s injected!

According to the examiner.com:

Squalene has been shown to cause severe autoimmune disorders like multiple sclerosis, reheumatoid arthritis and Lupus. Furthermore, Blaylock claims this particular vaccine adjuvant is connected to the Gulf War syndrome that killed thousands of soldiers and caused a 200% increase in Lou Gehreg’s disease.

Another issue of similar proportion is that of the Gardasil treatment for teenage girls to prevent cancer.

Is there a pattern here? Are we becoming human guinea pigs?

Who, including which drug companies are we supposed to trust?

And why is the vaccine for pregnant women different than that for the rest of us?

H1N1 is no joke. It seems to be taking it’s toll, and the biggest risk group seems to be teenagers that have not been exposed to this flu that has been around in the past, making the older generation less likely to get sick.

But like a loaded gun, and the effect on those that were injected with squalene in the Gulf war that now have health problems, are we asking for bigger trouble?

Squalene is mixed into the formula for one reason and one reason only – more bang for the buck! It all boils down to the “almighty dollar”.

I’m starting to feel like that human guinea pig, or rat:

A 2000 study published in the American Journal of Pathology demonstrated a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,” also known as rheumatoid arthritis.

People don’t know the facts and understand the implications. It reminds me of the insurance industry, where the real issue is finding an agent to trust, and not knowing all the ins and outs. The question is, is the medical word trustworthy when the soldiers of the U.S. military continue to be exploited medically, and in every other way too.

  Shouldn’t we all  start asking the hard questions?

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Related posts:

Dental health is not just a “mouth” issue Well, did you know that periodontal disease is linked to...Insurance for Dummies 101: Are your insurance plans draining or ensuring cash flow? It was hard to put this topic out there. What...Benefit plans ABC, 123 – Sesame Street style (Ontario & Alberta, Canada 1.866.856.6799) Why does insurance advice have to be technical and complicated?...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


View the original article here

No comments:

Post a Comment